EDP Foz Tua: Terrestrial Vertebrates Baseline_studies (EIA) [2006]
The dataset contains records of terrestrial vertebrates (Amphibians, Reptiles and Macromammals) colected in the lower Tua river and included in the Baseline Studies of the Environmental Impact Assessment of the Foz Tua Hydroelectric Dam, promoted by EDP – Energias de Portugal, S.A. Data were collected between May and September 2006, during field visits to nine 5km-sections of the river Tua, between the mouth and the village of Cachão, 45 km upstream. The presence of taxa belonging to the target groups (individuals and/or evidence of occurrence, like scats or footprints) was recorded. Twenty-eight taxa were identified, 26 to the species rank (5 amphibians, 12 reptiles and 9 mammals), and two to the genus rank (1 amphibian and 1 mammal).
Default
Identification
- Alternate Identifier
-
8918109e-0d4a-4cc9-af7b-8e49d31df942
- Publication Date
- 2018-06-28
- Title
-
EDP Foz Tua: Terrestrial Vertebrates Baseline_studies (EIA) [2006]
- Abstract
-
The dataset contains records of terrestrial vertebrates (Amphibians, Reptiles and Macromammals) colected in the lower Tua river and included in the Baseline Studies of the Environmental Impact Assessment of the Foz Tua Hydroelectric Dam, promoted by EDP – Energias de Portugal, S.A. Data were collected between May and September 2006, during field visits to nine 5km-sections of the river Tua, between the mouth and the village of Cachão, 45 km upstream. The presence of taxa belonging to the target groups (individuals and/or evidence of occurrence, like scats or footprints) was recorded. Twenty-eight taxa were identified, 26 to the species rank (5 amphibians, 12 reptiles and 9 mammals), and two to the genus rank (1 amphibian and 1 mammal).
- purpose
-
This dataset is part of a broader initiative whereby the company EDP - Energias de Portugal S.A. will made available biodiversity data collected during impact assessment and biological monitoring studies.
- Dataset Language
-
ENGLISH
- Dataset Creator
-
CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos - Tiago Múrias (Researcher)
Campus Agrário de Vairão
,Vairão
,4485-661
,
- Dataset Creator
-
CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto - Sérgio Bruno Ribeiro (Technician)
Campus Agrário de Vairão
,Vairão
,4485-661
,
- Dataset Creator
-
CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e - Paulo Célio Alves (Coordinator)
Campus Agrário de Vairão
,Vairão
,4485-661
,PORTUGAL
- Metadata Provider
-
Tiago Múrias (Researcher)
Campus Agrário de Vairão - Crasto
,CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto
,4485-661
,PORTUGAL
- Associated Party
-
USER
CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto - Tiago Múrias (Researcher)
Campus Agrário de Vairão
,Vairão
,4485-661
,
- Dataset Contact
-
EDP - Energia de Portugal - João Madeira (Manager)
Av. 24 de Julho, 12, Torre Nascente, Piso 4
,Lisbon
,1249-300 Lisboa
,PORTUGAL
- Keywords (GBIF Dataset Type Vocabulary: http://rs.gbif.org/vocabulary/gbif/dataset_type.xml)
-
-
Occurrence; Observation; amphibians; reptiles; terrestrial macromammals; presence; transects; 5 km-sections
-
Geographic Coverage
- Geographic Description
-
The data were collected in the last 45 km of the river Tua (Northeast Portugal), from the village of Cachão to its mouth, within the municipalities of Alijó, Carrazeda de Ansiães, Murça, Vila Flor and Mirandela
Bounding Box
- West Bounding Coordinate
-
-7.464
- East Bounding Coordinate
-
-7.155
- North Bounding Coordinate
-
41.423
- South Bounding Coordinate
-
41.211
Temporal Coverage
Range of Dates
- Begin Date
-
2006-05-05
- End Date
-
2006-09-15
Taxonomic Coverage
- General Taxonomic Coverage
-
The taxonomic coverage of this dataset spans 1 phylum, 3 classes, 8 orders, 19 families, 26 species and 2 genus.
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Phylum
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Chordata
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Class
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Amphibia
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Class
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Reptilia
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Class
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Mammalia
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Order
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Anura
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Order
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Caudata
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Order
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Squamata
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Order
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Testudines
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Order
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Carnivora
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Order
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Lagomoprha
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Order
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Artiodactyla
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Order
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Rodentia
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Alytidae
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Salamandridae
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Ranidae
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Bufonidae
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Lacertidae
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Blanidae
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Scincidae
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Colubridae
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Lamprophiidae
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Geoemydidae
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Natricidae
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Phyllodactylidae
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Viverridae
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Mustelidae
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Leporidae
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Sciuridae
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Suidae
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Canidae
Taxonomic Classification
- Taxonomic Rank Name
-
Family
- Taxonomic Rank Value
-
Muridae
License Information
- Intellectual Rights
-
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License
.
Additional Metadata
Metadata
GBIF Metadata Block
- Date Stamp
-
2021-11-29T09:04:02Z
- Citation
-
Múrias T, Ribeiro S B, Alves P C (2018). EDP Foz Tua: Terrestrial Vertebrates Baseline_studies (EIA) [2006]. EDP - Energias de Portugal. Sampling event dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/3yzo7e accessed via GBIF.org on 2021-11-29.
Project
• Project
- Title
-
Baseline Studies to the Environmental Impact Assessment of the Foz Tua Hydroelectric Dam – Terrestrial Vertebrates (EIA)
Personnel
Individual Name
- Given Name
-
Tiago
- Surname
-
Múrias
- Role
-
AUTHOR
Personnel
Individual Name
- Given Name
-
Sérigo Bruno
- Surname
-
Ribeiro
- Role
-
AUTHOR
Personnel
Individual Name
- Given Name
-
Paulo Célio
- Surname
-
Alves
- Role
-
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
- Abstract
-
The dataset contains records of terrestrial vertebrates (Amphibians, Reptiles and Macromammals) colected in the lower Tua river and included in the Baseline Studies to the Environmental Impact Assessment of the Foz Tua Hydroelectric Dam, promoted by EDP – Energias de Portugal, S.A. Data were collected between May and September 2006, during field visits to nine 5km-sections of the river Tua, between the mouth and the village of Cachão, 45 km upstream. The occurrence of the target taxa was documented through 91 observations or evidence of occurrence inequivocaly established. In total, 28 taxa were identified, 26 to the species rank (5 amphibians, 12 reptiles and 9 mammals), and two to the genus rank (1 amphibian and 1 mammal).The most common species were Psammodromus algirus (Reptilia, squamata), with 12 occurrences and Martes foina (Mammalia, Carnivora) with 10 occurrences. Other relevant taxa were Tarentola mauritanica (Reptilia, Squamata), with 7 occurrences and Vulpes vulpes and Lutra lutra (Mammalia Carnivora) with 6 occurrences each.
- Funding
-
The work was funded by EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A.
Study Area Description
- Descriptor
-
The study was conducted in part of the sub-basin of river Tua, prior to the construction and subsequent flooding of the lower part of this river’s valley by the Foz-Tua Hydroelectric Dam, along the lower valleys of river Tua.
Design Description
- Description
-
The objective of the study was to document the occurrence of the target groups in the lower Tua valley in order to assess the environmental relevance of the study area to the fauna of terrestrial vertebrates within the scope of the EIA of the Foz-Tua dam.
Methods
• Method
Method Step
- Description
-
To be completed
Sampling
- Study Extent
-
The study was carried out in nine 5km-sections of the river Tua, which were visited several times between May and September 2006, from the mouth to the village of Cachão, 45 km upstream.
- Sampling Description
-
Sampling was designed to cover an area of 5 km x 1 km (approximately) in each section of river considered. One to several 1.2 km transects per section were established, mostly along the deactivated river Tua railway, but also in the hillsides of the valley, covering both margins. Each transect was visited once between May and September 2006, but all efforts were made to ensure that each river section received at least one transect. Additional observations made in the same time frame outside the sampling transects were also included.
Each 1.2 km-transect was walked at a slow pace, and apart from the spontaneous observations, an effort was made to search all places in the path that had the appropriate habitat conditions (eg., holes, bushes, ponds, streams). The position of each species detected (either directly by observation or indirectly by examining scats and/or footprints) was recorded and georeferenced with a GPS (WGS84 datum).
Species identification were usually possible “in locus” in the case of observation events and for footprints, through appropriate field guides. In the case of the scats, whenever an unequivocal identification was not possible in the field, they were taken for laboratory for subsequent anatomic analysis (fur examination). Only the occurrence (ie, presence/absence) of the species in each point and transect was documented, that is, no effort was made to quantify the number of individuals or scats/footprints present for each observation.
qualityControl
- Description
-
...